2018 (8) TMI 1510

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....lan, Advocate For the Appellant Shri M. Arjun Raghavendra, DC (AR) For the Respondent ORDER Per Madhu Mohan Damodhar Appellants are engaged in maintenance of Guest House and Housekeeping services for various corporate companies. Pursuant to audit of accounts / records of the appellants, it appeared to the department that they had collected service tax separately over and above the serv....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....In adjudication, Commissioner vide, impugned order dt. 28.02.2011 found that entire rental income in respect of Pune property of appellants is exempt from any levy as it is covered by Board's circular No.334/1/2007 dt. 28.02.2007 and hence set aside demand of Rs. 36,74,612/- proposed in respect of the Pune Branch activities. However in respect of services provided by appellant in Chennai, the adju....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....cate therefore requested for a remand in the matter. He also requested that considering the matter is very old, the de novo adjudication, if acceded to, may be directed to be completed within a time frame. 3. On the other hand, Ld.A.R Shri Arjun Raghavendra supports the impugned order. However, he has no objection to the matter being remanded. 4. Heard both sides. We find that interest of ju....