2018 (8) TMI 1243
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
..... Mr. Pradeep S. Jetly for the respondents. P.C. :- 1. The petitioner is aggrieved and dissatisfied with what he feels is an arbitrary and illegal command issued by respondent nos. 3 and 4 to the distinct authority, namely, the Development Commissioner-respondent no. 2. That authority is functional pursuant to the law, namely, the Foreign Trade (Development and Regulation) Act, 1992. The ....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
.... Kindly refer to your letter dated 25.09.2017 on the subject cited above. In this connection we write to inform you that the Office of Principal Commissioner of Customs (Preventive) Nava Sheva Preventive Unit, Rummaging & Intelligence 11th Floor, Annexe Building, New Custom House, Ballard Estate, Mumbai- 400001 has informed that investigation against the unit product is under progress. There....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....from a distinct authority has resulted in the petitioner's benefits, as an exporter under a distinct scheme, namely, Merchandise Exports From India Scheme (MEIS), being taken away. 3. The petitioner has made representations in the month of November and December, 2017, copies of which are at Exhibits 'J' and 'K' to the petition. The petitioner says that a specific order shoul....


TaxTMI