2018 (8) TMI 1213

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....MEMBER Shri Mohammed Rahim, Advocate For the Appellant Shri Pakshirajan, Asst. Commissioner(AR) For the Respondent ORDER Per: S.S. GARG The appellant has moved a miscellaneous application under Rule 41 of CESTAT(Procedure) Rules, 1982 seeking rectification of mistake occurred in the Final Order No.21789/2017 passed by this Tribunal on 24/08/2017. The applicant has further stated in ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....2. Heard both sides and perused records. 3. Learned counsel for the appellant submitted that the Tribunal in para 5 of the Final order dt 24/08/2017 was pleased to set aside the impugned order by allowing the appeal of the appellant with consequential relief. But in spite of that, the Department has only sanctioned the refund of Rs. 5,32,440/- and denied the refund of Rs. 4,89,600/- merely on t....