Loading...

⚠ โœ•
❮ Top
☎ Help
Draft upto 3 replies to a
tax notice โ€” FREE ๐ŸŽ‰ โœ•

150 credits ยท 30 days

โ€ข Basic Search โ†’ 1 Credit
โ€ข Advanced Search โ†’ 3 Credits
โ€ข Drafter โ†’ 20 to extract + 25 per issue
(โ‰ˆ upto 2-3 drafts on us)

Already used our earlier 20-Credit Demo?
You are still eligible for this new 150-Credit Demo.

Activate your FREE Demo โ†’
☰
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
Call Us / Help / Feedbackโœ•

Contact Us At :

✉ E-mail: [email protected]

✆ Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters 0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / TMI Blogs / RSS

2017 (10) TMI 1350

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... (AR) ORDER Per: Dr. D.N. Panda 1. None present for appellant despite notice. Notice has gone in this case on 19.09.2017 2. Learned D.R. brings out that there is mis-declaration of description of goods (printing machinery) as well as the value thereof at the time of import. While the import was made on 05.05.2007 vide Bill of Entry No. 001261 declaring the value of thereof as US $ 2,7....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... determined, life of printing machine and year of manufacture as value addition made from time to time was taken into account. When that was compared with the value declared made by appellant, misdeclaration of value was noticed. Goods was finally provisionally released. When comparative figures of import made in February and March was considered, learned authority held that there was deliberate m....