2017 (11) TMI 1678

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

...., Supdt. (A.R.) ORDER Per Mrs. Archana Wadhwa : Heard the ld.A.R. for the Revenue. None present for the appellant. 2.After hearing the ld.A.R. appearing for the Revenue, it is seen that the challenge in the present case is only to penalty under Rule 25 of the Central Excise Rules, 2002. It is also seen on record that during the period of default in terms of Rule 8 of Central Excise Rul....