Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

2018 (8) TMI 167

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....eged that induction furnace units engaged in the manufacture of MS ingots as that of M/s Steel Abrasive Industries Ltd., Noticee No.1 are showing consumption of electricity in excess to ideal limit and are also engaged in suppression of production and clandestine removal thereof through M/s. Monu Steels, Noticee No.2, who are engaged in the business of facilitating sale and purchase transactions of iron and steel products on behalf of manufacturer seller and purchaser of iron and steel products on commission basis. Accordingly, a team of Preventive Officers of Central Excise Headquarters, Raipur searched the Office premises of Noticee No.2 on 15.01.2007. On the basis of the documents recovered through M/s Monu Steels, it was alleged that M/....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....nge iron, the raw material for their final products. It is alleged that demand upon appellant has been confirmed after scrutinising the documents of M/s. Monu Steel, but without any cogent corroborative evidence in this respect. It is impressed upon that major demand has already been set aside. The appeal in hand is accordingly prayed to be allowed. 4. While controverting these arguments, ld. DR has submitted that the case of the main noticee i.e. M/s. Steel Abrasive Industries Ltd. has not yet been decided. Any benefit as claimed by the appellant, in absence of said decision, will not be an appropriate finding. No question arises for setting aside of the penalty. Appeal is prayed to be rejected. 5. After hearing both the parties, we ....