Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / TMI Blogs / RSS

2018 (8) TMI 44

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... for the Appellant. The courier filed Bill of Entry No. 6405 dt. 18.12.2007 by declaring the value of US$ 105 (AV Rs. 5119/-). The Custom authorities conducted scrutiny of documents which revealed that the importer had agreed to pay US$ 21,000 for the 21 Episodes to supplier / licensor. It was found that the importer has not included the licence fee in the Assessable value of the imported goods. They were issued Show Cause Notice alleging that they have attempted to clear the consignment by mis-declaring the value and that the appellant and its agent M/s DHL Express (India) Pvt. Ltd. have jointly contravened the provision contained in section 111(m) of the Customs Act, 1962 and are therefore liable to pay penalty. It was proposed to enhance....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ully aware of the licence value of the consignment but knowingly and deliberately they tried to clear the same under the guise of courier Bill of Entry which is meant for low valued goods. In the present case the value of the goods were mis-declared to evade duty what so ever the reason for non-declaration may be on the part of the importer. It may be deliberately or on the belief that the same need not be done. He has held that the breach of the provision would attract penalty even if there is guilty intention or not. The Adjudicating Authority thus rejected the declared value and enhanced the same to Rs. 8,59,488/-. He also ordered confiscation of goods under section 111 (m) with an option to redeem the same on payment of redemption fine ....