Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / TMI Blogs / RSS

2000 (11) TMI 32

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....rred to us in this case is similar to the one that was considered by this court in the case of CIT v. M. N. Sulaiman [1999] 238 ITR 139. That was a case under the Income-tax Act while these cases are under the Wealth-tax Act. However, the scope of the revisional powers of the Commissioner under the two Acts is similar. For the assessment years 1978-79 and 1979-80, the wealth-tax assessment was ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ommissioner holding that he should not have taken note of the valuation report which was received subsequent to the date of the assessment. This court in the case of M. N. Sulaiman [1999] 238 ITR 139, has held in similar facts and circumstances arising under the Income-tax Act that the valuation report submitted subsequent to the assessment, which report had been called for prior to the assessm....