Loading...

⚠ โœ•
❮ Top
☎ Help
Draft upto 3 replies to a
tax notice โ€” FREE ๐ŸŽ‰ โœ•

150 credits ยท 30 days

โ€ข Basic Search โ†’ 1 Credit
โ€ข Advanced Search โ†’ 3 Credits
โ€ข Drafter โ†’ 20 to extract + 25 per issue
(โ‰ˆ upto 2-3 drafts on us)

Already used our earlier 20-Credit Demo?
You are still eligible for this new 150-Credit Demo.

Activate your FREE Demo โ†’
☰
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
Call Us / Help / Feedbackโœ•

Contact Us At :

✉ E-mail: [email protected]

✆ Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters 0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / TMI Blogs / RSS

2001 (7) TMI 88

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....lowing question has been referred to this court for its opinion under the provisions of section 256(1) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as "the Act"), by the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal, Ahmedabad Bench "A": "Whether, on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Tribunal was right in law in allowing deduction of Rs.5,000 to the assessee under section 80VV of the ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....g Officer and allowed the deduction. Being aggrieved by the order passed in appeal, the Revenue had filed an appeal before the Tribunal. The appeal was dismissed. It is not necessary that the expenditure incurred by the assessee must be actually paid unless, the assessee is following the cash system of accounting. It is not the case here that the assessee was following the cash system of accoun....