Loading...

⚠ โœ•
❮ Top
☎ Help
Draft upto 3 replies to a
tax notice โ€” FREE ๐ŸŽ‰ โœ•

150 credits ยท 30 days

โ€ข Basic Search โ†’ 1 Credit
โ€ข Advanced Search โ†’ 3 Credits
โ€ข Drafter โ†’ 20 to extract + 25 per issue
(โ‰ˆ upto 2-3 drafts on us)

Already used our earlier 20-Credit Demo?
You are still eligible for this new 150-Credit Demo.

Activate your FREE Demo โ†’
☰
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
Call Us / Help / Feedbackโœ•

Contact Us At :

✉ E-mail: [email protected]

✆ Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters 0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / TMI Blogs / RSS

2001 (1) TMI 22

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....llowing question has been referred for the opinion of this court under section 256(1) of the Income tax Act, 1961 (in short 'the Act"), for the two assessment years, i.e., 1975-76 and 1976-77, by the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal, Delhi Bench "F", New Delhi (in short "the Tribunal"): "Whether, on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Tribunal was correct in law in holding that the....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....u of salary and/or a perquisite in terms of section 17(2)(v) of the Act. Though the Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals) (in short "the CIT (A)"), held that it was to be taxed, the Tribunal took a different view. On being moved for reference, the question, as set out above, has been referred for the opinion of this court. We have heard learned counsel for the Revenue and learned counsel for the....