Supreme Court dismisses special leave petition, allows raising issues in CESTAT appeal.Principles of Natural Justice - effective opportunity of hearing before the respondent not afforded - alternative remedy of appeal - Held that:- There is no ground to interfere with the impugned order passed by the High Court - The special leave petition is dismissed.... ... ... Title: Supreme Court of India dismisses special leave petition

- Citation: 2018 (7) TMI 869 - SC
- Justices: Mr. Rohinton Fali Nariman and Mrs. R. Banumathi
- Petitioner's Counsel: Mr. Guru Krishnakumar, Sr. Adv., Mr. Adolf Mathew, Adv., Mr. Sanjay Jain, AOR
- Respondent: None
- Decision: Delay condoned; no interference with High Court order; special leave petition dismissed
- Option for petitioner to raise pleas, including value of statements without cross-examination, in appeal before CESTAT. Principles of Natural Justice - effective opportunity of hearing before the respondent not afforded - alternative remedy of appeal - Held that:- There is no ground to interfere with the impugned order passed by the High Court - The special leave petition is dismissed. P.A. Naushad Versus The Commissioner of Customs
Customs
2018 (7) TMI 869 - SC Order - 2018 (361) E.L.T. A24 (SC)
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA - SC
Dated:- 16-3-2018
Special Leave Petition (Civil) Diary No(s). 4216/2018 - -
Customs
Mr. Rohinton Fali Nariman And Mrs. R. Banumathi JJ. For the Petitioner(s) : Mr. Guru Krishnakumar, Sr. Adv., Mr. Adolf Mathew, Adv. And Mr. Sanjay Jain, AOR For the Respondent(s) : None ORDER Delay condoned. We see no reason to interfere with the impugned order passed by the High Court. The special leave petition is dismissed. However, it will be open to the petitioner, if an appeal is filed before CESTAT, to take up all pleas including the plea of the value of statements made without cross-examination.
Case laws, Decisions, Judgements, Orders