2018 (7) TMI 15
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....and S. Sathya Narayanan, for the Respondent. ORDER Heard M/s. Cynduja Krishnan, Learned Counsel for the petitioner, Mr. B. Rabu Manohar, Learned Counsel for the first respondent and Mr. S. Sathya Narayanan, Learned Counsel for the second respondent. 2. The petitioner has filed this writ petition challenging an order passed by the first respondent dated 8-2-2008, addressed to the seco....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....ioner has drawn the attention of this Court to paragraph 10(1)(1)(d) of the modified rehabilitation scheme, which reads as follows : "10(1)(1)(d) Department of Central Excise and Customs : The Deptt. of DCEC to grant 12 years' time from the commencement of the rehabilitation scheme, for complying with Export Obligation requirements in respect of import of capital equipment for the company." ....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....erefore, the first respondent has to reconsider the matter and pass a fresh order, since time has been granted to the petitioner for complying with the export obligation. 7. Thus, for the above reasons, this writ petition is disposed of by remanding the matter to the first respondent for fresh consideration. The first respondent shall issue a notice to the petitioner, who shall appear thro....
TaxTMI