2018 (6) TMI 1445
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....appeal against the order passed by the learned CESTAT in Appeal No.C/1486/2010-SM, Commissioner of Customs, Mangalore-CUS Vs. Mangalore Refinery and Petrochemicals Ltd., 2. The question involved in the present case is for the period 13.01.1996 to 15.03.1998 with regard to 144 consignments imported by the respondent-assessee through IOCL and that the ground of unjust enrichment does not apply to....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....essment under Section 18 of the Act. 4. The relevant para 10 of the said judgment of co- ordinate bench dated 29.01.2015, is quoted below for ready reference: "10. Section 27 of the Act provides for claiming of refund of duty. It relates to a claim for refund of duty or interest paid by the assessee or borne by him in a case not falling under the provisional assessment. Sub-section (2)....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....n (5). If for a claim under Section 18 of the Act, if an assessee has to put forth a claim under Section 27 of the Act, there was no necessity for the parliament to introduce Sub-section (2) of Section 27 of the Act by way of Sub-section (5) of Section 18 of the Act. It only demonstrates Sections 18 and 27 are merely exclusive. Section 27 applies to a case of constitutional levy, illegal levy or a....
Generate professional replies, appeals, opinions to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
TaxTMI