2018 (6) TMI 871
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....ppellant. Shri M.R. Sharma, Authorized Representative (DR) - for the Respondent. Per. C.L. Mahar :- The appellant is engaged in manufacture of PP bags and it has been alleged that they have not paid central excise duty on the additional consideration of sales tax collected from the buyers and retained by them to the extent of sales tax liability, actually not paid to the State Exchequer d....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
.... above, the appellants are covered by the Investment Promotion Schemes of the Rajasthan Government. In terms of the various schemes of the Rajasthan Government, the appellants are required to discharge their VAT liability by making payment of the same. Out of such VAT credited to the Government, a certain portion is disbursed back to them in the form of subsidies. Such disbursement happens in the ....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....ter 01/07/2000, unless the sales tax/VAT is actually paid to the good, no benefit towards excise duty can be given in terms of Section 4(3)(d). However, we note that the Tribunal in the case of Welspun Corporation Ltd. (Supra) has distinguished the decision of the Apex Court in the light of Gujarat VAT Act, 2003. In the Welspun Corporation Ltd. case, the assesse had opted for remission of tax sche....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....n as VAT actually paid. 10. It is pertinent to reproduce the observations of the Tribunal in the Welspun Corporation Ltd. case "5.1 The Respondent company opted for "Remission of Tax Scheme" and was thus eligible for the Capital subsidy in the form of remission of Sales Tax subject to the conditions to be fulfilled.... The subsidy in the form of remission of sales tax was in fact a per....
TaxTMI