2007 (8) TMI 785

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....or M/S Trivedi & Gupta for Appellant(s) None for Opponent(s) ORAL ORDER Honourable Mr.Justice M.S.Shah This appeal is directed against the ex-parte adinterim order dated 02.08.2007 passed by the Company Law Board, Prinaipal Bench, New Delhi in Company Petition No.111 of 2007, which was earlier challenged by another party in OJ Appeal No.197 of 2007. 2. The said Company Petition No.111 of ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....lant has sought to raise various contentions including the contention that the present appellant - AnandRao Gaekwar (respondent No.3 in the Company Petition) is not a necessary party and that the Company Law Board could not have granted any relief so as to adversely affect the present appellant. 4. We have not permitted the learned counsel to raise any such contentions before us, because the Comp....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....eply by 03.09.2007. The rejoinder shall be filed by 10.09.2007 and the interlocutory application shall be heard by the Company Law Board as expeditiously as possible and preferably by 30.09.2007. (ii) For the reasons which have already indicated in our order dated 23.08.2007, we expect the Company Law Board to hear and decide the interlocutory application within the above time limit. (iii) It wi....