AI Drafter - (New and Powerful) 
Generate professional replies, appeals, opinions to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter. 
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
2018 (6) TMI 392
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....ri C. Singh, Assistant Commissioner (AR) for respondent ORDER These appeals are directed against Order-in-Appeal No: MUM-CUSTM-SMP-190 to 193/2016-17 passed by the Commissioner of Customs (Appeals) Mumbai-I 2. Heard both the sides and perused the records. 3. On perusal of the records, it transpires that the issue relates to redemption fine on confiscation of TV sets importe....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....d used cathode ray tube. During the proceedings before the lower authorities also M/s ARJ Exim (India) sought for re-export of the goods to the country of origin which were permitted by the adjudicating authority. The adjudicating authority has held that the goods are liable for confiscation under Section 111(d) and (m) read with Foreign Trade (Development and Regulation) Act, 1992 and the rules m....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....y is liable to be visited with penalty under Section 112(a) of the Customs Act, 1962. Penalty imposed by the adjudicating authority is in consonance with the standards laid down by the Tribunal. 6. Accordingly, I find no reason to interfere with such an order and penalty imposed on ARJ Exim (India) is upheld and the appeal filed by them is rejected. 7. As regards penalty of Rs. 1....