Just a moment...

Top
Help
AI Drafter

Generate professional replies to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.

Step 1 – Issue Identification & Review

The AI analyses your query, notice, order, or uploaded documents and identifies the key issues involved.

• Review the issues identified by the AI
• Add, edit, remove, or refine issues as required


Step 2 – Draft Generation

Once you approve the issues, the AI performs issue-wise legal research and prepares a structured draft response.

• Relevant statutory provisions
• Judicial precedents and Supreme Court, High Court and other citations
• Issue-wise legal analysis
• Practical arguments and supporting content
• Professionally structured draft ready for further review.

Try Now
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

2018 (5) TMI 996

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....missioner (AR) for Respondent Per: Ramesh Nair The facts of the case are that the appellants have imported Gambier Extracts from Indonesia and the value of UU$ 1400 PMT was declared under 3 Bills of Entry bearing No. 12972 & 12982 both dated 29.5.1998 and 7871 dated 3.6.1998. The goods were provisionally cleared, pending investigation into the valuation aspect, taking PD Bond for differentia....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....he appellant submits that the invoice of contemporaneous imports of February and March, 1998 was relied upon, whereas the appellant's import is of May and June, 1998. Therefore, the contemporaneous import as relied upon is not of the same period. He submits that remittance against the import was correctly made as per the value declared by the appellant and no evidence of extra consideration wa....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....eferring to the US$ 1750 upheld the enhancement of the value to US$ 2200 PMT. 4. Ms. Trupti D Chavan, learned Assistant Commissioner (AR) appearing on behalf of the Revenue reiterates the findings of the impugned order. 5. We have carefully considered the submissions made by both sides. We find that the appellant has made detailed submission with some other Bills of Entry of the relevant per....