2018 (5) TMI 975

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... For the Appellant Shri N. Jagadish, Superintendent (AR)   - For the Respondent ORDER Per : S.S. Garg The present appeal is directed against the impugned order dt. 28/10/2016 passed by the Commissioner(Appeals) whereby the Commissioner(Appeals) has rejected the appeal at the threshold for failure to comply with the provisions of Section 35F. 2.  Briefly the facts of t....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....iod from 2008-09 to 06/2012. Aggrieved by the order-in-original, the appellant filed appeal before the Commissioner (AppeaIs) on the ground that the appellant had carried out the activity of sugar bag filling, handling, loading, unloading, printing etc. involved both different items of work at separate rates prescribed in contract and executed the work in lump sum and not on per labour basis and f....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....uld not be filed. Further the Commissioner (Appeals) has observed that in the present case, there was a delay of 26 days but the appellant has not filed any application  seeking condonation of delay by showing sufficient cause for not filing the appeal within the prescribed time. Thereafter the Commissioner (Appeals) has proceeded to dismiss the appeal on account of failure to comply with the....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... filing the appeal before the Commissioner (Appeals). He further submitted that for condoning the delay before the Commissioner (Appeals), COD application is not required to be filed before this Tribunal. He also submitted that the Commissioner (Appeals) has not dismissed the appeal of the appellant only on the ground of delay in filing the appeal rather the Commissioner (Appeals) has dismissed th....