Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

2018 (5) TMI 535

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....uring the period August, 2012 to April, 2013, appellants herein had purchased SS Plates, Sheets, Coils etc., and availed the CENVAT credit of the Central Excise duty paid on such goods, the said goods were used for fabrication of various vessels and tanks which are further put to use in the factory premises. Lower Authorities were of the view, that CENVAT credit so availed is incorrect and directed the appellant to reverse the same; Show Cause Notice dated 07.03.2014 was issued which was adjudicated and demand for the CENVAT credit availed, along with interest and penalty was confirmed against the appellant. 4. Learned Counsel draws my attention to the definition of inputs as provided under Rule 2(k) of the CENVAT Credit Rules, 2004 and ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....cepted the contention and the First Appellate Authority as also rejected the same. 7. I find from Order-in-Original in paragraph No. 12, the Adjudicating Authority has recorded that appellant had enclosed annexure containing details of usage of the said SS Plates and Steels. The said usage of the goods in manufacturer of receivers has been summarily dismissed by the lower authorities without even considering the said arguments in its correct perspective by recording that appellant did not mention the details of such items claimed to have been manufactured in the periodical returns. It is seen that no where it has been disputed that there was receipt of a said SS Sheets and Coils in the factory premises of the appellant. I find that the d....