Just a moment...

Top
Help
AI OCR

Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page

Try Now
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

2018 (4) TMI 1437

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....or The Respondent : Mrs. Hema Muralikrishnan Central Government Standing Counsel ORDER This writ petition is filed against the show cause notice dated 31. 10. 2017, issued under Section 28 and Section 124 of the Customs Act, 1962, calling upon the petitioner and two others to show cause as to why the confiscation of the subject matter goods shall not be made, etc. , as referred to in the show c....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....not having jurisdiction to issue the same, only on the claim that it was issued on a wrong person. Needless to say, that the question whether a notice issued was on right person or wrong person, is a factual issue of the matter, which has to be necessarily considered and decided by the authority, who issued the said notice. Therefore, it does not mean that the Authority, who issued the notice is l....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....s not been issued with any show cause notice and therefore, the second respondent is not justified in issuing the show cause notice to the petitioner, which is impugned in this writ petition. Again this contention is another factual aspect of the matter, which has to be raised and to be considered and decided by the second respondent. 5. Accordingly, this Court is of the view that there is no jur....