2018 (4) TMI 1327

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....t Shri M P Damle, Assistant Commissioner (AR) for the respondent Per: S K Mohanty: This appeal is directed against the impugned order dated 08/07/2014, passed by the Commissioner of Central Excise & Service Tax, Kolhapur. 2. Brief facts of the case are that the appellant herein, is engaged in the manufacture of molding boxes, falling under tariff item No. 8480 30 00 of the Central Exci....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ed by the appellant before passing of the adjudication order was appropriated against the adjudged demands. Besides, the impugned order has also imposed penalties under Section 77 and 78 of the Finance Act, 1994 on the appellant. 3. The Learned Consultant appearing for the appellant submit ted that the appellant is not contesting the service tax demand along with interest confirmed on it and ha....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... has reiterate d the findings recorded in the impugned order. 5. Heard both the sides and perused the records. 6. We find that the appellant is not contesting the service tax demand and interest amount confirmed in the adjudication order. The service tax demand along with interest was also paid by the appellant before adjudication of the matter and the same has also been appropriated in the ....