2018 (4) TMI 1316

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....Vs-C.C.E. & S.T.- INDORE , OCEAN IMPEX-Vs-C.C.E. & S.T.-INDORE , GAURAV MUNGAD- Vs-CGST C.E & C.C- BHOPAL , OMPRAKASH MAHESHWARI-Vs- CGST C.E & C.C- BHOPAL , VAIBHAV MUNGAD- Vs-C.C.E. & S.T.- INDORE , RAVI LADDHA-Vs- CGST C.E & C.C- BHOPAL , JIJI INDUSTRIES LTD- Vs-CGST C.E & C.C- BHOPAL , VAIBHAV MUNGAD- Vs-CGST C.E & C.C- BHOPAL , ABHAS MUNGAD-Vs- CGST C.E & C.C- BHOPAL , , Hon'ble Mr. Justice (Dr.) Satish Chandra, President And Hon'ble Mr. V. Padmanabhan, Member (Technical) Shri R K Verma, Advocate for the Appellants Shri M R Sharma, AR for the Respondent ORDER Per: Justice (Dr.) Satish Chandra Delay in filing the appeals is condoned for the reasons mentioned in the applications. Appeals are admitted. All the appeals....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... writ petition No. 3847/2016 in the Hon'ble High Court of Madhya Pradesh, Indore Bench, which was dismissed on 05.07.2016. 4. Still not being satisfied, the appellant filed the SLP (No. 23374/2016) before the Hon'ble Supreme Court. The Hon'ble Supreme Court on 6.11.17 passed the following order:- "We are not inclined to interfere with the impugned order. The Special Leave Petition is dismissed. However,  the  Petitioner may  file a preliminary reply to the show cause notice within a period of two weeks." 5. The said order was passed on 6.1.2017, so two weeks come to an end on 20.1.2017. 6. During the course of arguments, Shri R K Verma submits that on 20.1.2017, the appellant went to the of....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....nd utterly failed to avail the same. I thus observe that the Noticee No. 1 and 2 are not interested in placing their defence on record and have circumvented various opportunities of defence extended to them. It is to reiterate that while issuing SCN, it was also categorically mentioned in the SCN that all the Noticees were required to file their written replies within 30 days of the receipt of the same. It was also specifically pointed out in SCN that if they do not show cause against the action proposed in the SCN within the above stipulated period of 30 days and / or if they or their representative(s) do not appear before the adjudicating authority, on the date and at the time fixed for hearing, then the case shall be liable to be dispose....