Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / TMI Blogs / RSS

2001 (10) TMI 42

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... JAWAHAR LAL GUPTA J.-The assessee filed its return of income for the assessment year 1990-91. The assessee had, inter alia, shown income as under: ------------------------------------------------------------------------ (i) Income from rent                          ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ale of plot was held as income from "capital gain". Thus, the taxable income was fixed at Rs.3,59,470. Aggrieved by the order, the assessee filed an appeal and claimed that the additions had been wrongly made. The appeal was accepted. The Revenue filed an appeal before the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal. The appeal having been dismissed, it has approached this court through this appeal under sec....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....depreciation could not have been allowed. The Commissioner had erred in accepting the assessee's claim on the total property. The contention is misconceived. Even the question framed by the Revenue in its petition of appeal shows that the depreciation had been claimed "on the let-out property" only. Mr. Sawhney submits that the Tribunal has erred while interpreting the decision of their Lord....