2018 (4) TMI 602
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
...., JJ. For The Appellant : Ms. Reema Jain, PCS For The Respondent : Mr. Vinit J. Mehta and Mr. Anirudh Puroshottam, Advocates ORDER This appeal has been preferred by Mr. Ranjeet Karnal, Director of Laser Care India Private Limited ('Corporate Debtor') against the order dated 22nd December, 2017 passed by the Adjudicating Authority (National Company Law Tribunal), Ahmedabad Bench in CP. ....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....etitioner served a copy of petition on the respondent and filed proof of service. Petitioner also filed proof of service of notice of the date of hearing on respondent. This Tribunal also directed Registry to issue notice of date of hearing on respondent. Registry of this Tribunal also issued notice to the respondent but it was returned unserved. None appeared for the respondent. Respondent has no....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....hearing of the application was not served on the 'Corporate Debtor' and returned unserved. It is also not disputed that the address of the 'Corporate Debtor' had been changed much prior to filing of the application under Section 7 of the 'I&B Code'; therefore, it is not clear as to how the 'Financial Creditor' filed proof of service of notice on the 'Corporate Debtor'. 6. Learned counsel appear....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....ned order dated 22nd December, 2017 which is set aside and remit the case to the Adjudicating Authority, Ahmedabad Bench for fresh decision. 8. The Appellant will ensure that the 'Corporate Debtor' appears through its counsel or representative (not through 'Resolution Professional'), will appear before the Adjudicating Authority on 22nd March, 2018 at 10.30 a.m. The 'Financial Creditor' will al....
TaxTMI