Loading...

⚠ โœ•
❮ Top
☎ Help
Draft upto 3 replies to a
tax notice โ€” FREE ๐ŸŽ‰ โœ•

150 credits ยท 30 days

โ€ข Basic Search โ†’ 1 Credit
โ€ข Advanced Search โ†’ 3 Credits
โ€ข Drafter โ†’ 20 to extract + 25 per issue
(โ‰ˆ upto 2-3 drafts on us)

Already used our earlier 20-Credit Demo?
You are still eligible for this new 150-Credit Demo.

Activate your FREE Demo โ†’
☰
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
Call Us / Help / Feedbackโœ•

Contact Us At :

✉ E-mail: [email protected]

✆ Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters 0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / TMI Blogs / RSS

2001 (9) TMI 33

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....J.-Income from the properties owned by the assessee has been treated as business income by the Tribunal. The correctness of that decision has been called into question by the Revenue in this reference. The assessment year is 1985-86. The business of the assessee is that of being maritime agent. No part of the premises, from which it received rent in the assessment year, was used for its busines....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ly exclusive and income derived from different sources falling under specific heads has to be computed for the purpose of taxation in the manner provided by the appropriate section. If the income from a source falls within a specific head set out in section 6, the fact that it may indirectly be covered by another head will not make the income taxable under the later head." In that case which ar....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....plant established by the assessee for dyeing silk yam and that plant had been leased out by the assessee as it had difficulty in obtaining silk yam during the chargeable accounting period, viz., January 1, 1943 to December 31, 1943. The question which the court was required to consider therein was as to whether that income of the assessee was chargeable to excess profits tax as profits of business....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....The question which requires consideration here was not a question which arose in that case. What was said there in the context of the excess profits tax cannot be applied to the case of income derived from house property by an assessee, which also carries on business. The decision in Shri Lakshmi Silk Mills Ltd.'s case [1951] 20 ITR 451 (SC) was not understood by the Supreme Court as being appl....