2018 (4) TMI 476

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (henceforth 'the Tribunal') dismissing the appellant's appeal refusing to allow cenvat credit on the item 'Bins' supplied by M/s Simplex Engineering and Foundry Works Pvt. Ltd. (for short 'M/s Simplex') by holding that the said 'Bins' was wrongly classified under the heading 8474.90 whereas the correct classification would fall under the heading 7308. 2. During the relevant period, M/s Simplex were awarded contract for supply of 'Bins' to the appellant which was supplied to the appellant's unit Bhilai Steel Plant, who in turn availed cenvat credit of duty paid on the said item under Rule 57-Q of the Central Excise Rules, 1944 (henceforth 'the Ru....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....le under sub-heading 7308.90 and confirmed the demand of duty from M/s Simplex with interest and penalty and modvat credit together with interest and penalty from the appellant - M/s Steel Authority of India, Bhilai Steel Plant. Aggrieved by the said order, the appellant preferred an appeal before the Tribunal which came to be decided on 6.6.2016 (Annexure-P/7) thereby setting aside the imposition of penalty, at the same time refusing to decide the appeal on merits pertaining to challenge to denial of credit, as the appellant was not granted permission by the Committee on Disputes (COD) to prefer appeal. 4. The appellant's appeal to the High Court bearing Tax Case No.140/2016 was disposed of remitting the matter back to the Tribunal ....