Loading...

⚠ โœ•
❮ Top
☎ Help
Draft upto 3 replies to a
tax notice โ€” FREE ๐ŸŽ‰ โœ•

150 credits ยท 30 days

โ€ข Basic Search โ†’ 1 Credit
โ€ข Advanced Search โ†’ 3 Credits
โ€ข Drafter โ†’ 20 to extract + 25 per issue
(โ‰ˆ upto 2-3 drafts on us)

Already used our earlier 20-Credit Demo?
You are still eligible for this new 150-Credit Demo.

Activate your FREE Demo โ†’
☰
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
Call Us / Help / Feedbackโœ•

Contact Us At :

✉ E-mail: [email protected]

✆ Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters 0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / TMI Blogs / RSS

1978 (1) TMI 175

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... This writ petition is to issue a writ of prohibition restraining the respondents from taking any further proceedings in pursuance of the notice dated October 8, 1973, issued by the second respondent and confirmed by the first respondent by his order dated June 11, 1974. 2. One M. D. T. Kumaraswami Mudaliar died on 25th December, 1957. He had three sons by his legally married wife and four sons....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....of an individual. After his death, the same state of affairs continued and the receiver appointed in the partition suit, O.S. No. 25 of 1955, continued to be assessed as an individual. As a result of the decree in the partition suit and on the basis that Kumaraswami Mudaliar and his sons constituted a joint family, a notice has been issued by the second respondent in 1973, proposing to revise the ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....vidual capacity, and, later, on the receiver in the status of an individual, he has no power to change his opinion and make an assessment treating the estate of Kumaraswami Mudaliar as an HUF as is proposed by him in the notice. The petitioner's contention that Kumaraswami Mudaliar before his death and later the receiver had disclosed all necessary and material particulars for deciding the que....