2018 (3) TMI 1324

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... For the Petitioner : Mr.V.Sundareswaran (in all WPs) For the Respondents : Mr.M.Hariharan (in all WPs) ORDER Heard Mr.V.Sundareswaran, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr.M.Hariharan, learned Additional Government Pleader appearing on behalf of the respondents. 2.The petitioner, who is a registered dealer on the file of the first respondent, is an aggrieved by the assessment....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....jections which where accompanied by documents, the first respondent has completed the assessment stating as if, the petitioner has not produced the documents. To examine the correctness of this submission, the learned Government Advocate is directed to get instructions in this matter and to file a counter. In the light of the above, there will be an order of interim stay. List on....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ed 31.08.2016. 5.On a perusal of the impugned order, I find that the Assessing Officer has stated that the petitioner has not produced documents. It is not known as to why the documents, which were received in the office of the first respondent on 10.06.2016, were not considered. The endorsement made in the letter delivery book has not been denied by the second respondent. Therefore, it is deem....