2018 (3) TMI 1324
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....areswaran (in all WPs) For the Respondents : Mr.M.Hariharan (in all WPs) ORDER Heard Mr.V.Sundareswaran, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr.M.Hariharan, learned Additional Government Pleader appearing on behalf of the respondents. 2.The petitioner, who is a registered dealer on the file of the first respondent, is an aggrieved by the assessment order for the assessment years 2007-08, 20....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....ent has completed the assessment stating as if, the petitioner has not produced the documents. To examine the correctness of this submission, the learned Government Advocate is directed to get instructions in this matter and to file a counter. In the light of the above, there will be an order of interim stay. List on 07.11.2016" Though the above order has recorded what is the submission of th....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....ficer has stated that the petitioner has not produced documents. It is not known as to why the documents, which were received in the office of the first respondent on 10.06.2016, were not considered. The endorsement made in the letter delivery book has not been denied by the second respondent. Therefore, it is deemed that all the records were available with the respondents when he passed the impug....