2016 (5) TMI 1432

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....tioner Smt. Lilly K. T. , Government Advocate, for respondent No. 1 JUDGMENT According to the petitioner, he is constructing a residential building on the strength of Ext.P1 building permit. For the said purpose, he purchased pincoda wood from the 2nd respondent, a dealer registered both under the KVAT Act and CST Act. Ext.P3 is a copy of the purchase bill dated 2.5.2016. On transportatio....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....nkoda 10gs.Square. In the circumstances, value estimated to 3,50,000/-. Rs. SD & penalty demanded." 4. In Interfield Laboratories v. State of Kerala (2016 (1) KLT 945) this Court held that the officer in charge of the notified area or the empowered officer can invoke the provisions under sub-section (2) of Section 47 of the KVAT Act, if he has reason to suspect that goods under transport are no....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....y Ext.P4 notice, it is for him to file an appropriate objection before the 1st respondent, along with supporting materials. If any such objection is received, the 1st respondent shall forward the same along with the relevant file to the competent authority for adjudication, who shall pass appropriate orders, with notice to the petitioner, within a period of two months from the date of receipt of t....