2018 (3) TMI 1105

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....nts: (By Sri Vikram Huilgol, HCGP)   B.M. SHYAM PRASAD J., JUDGMENT The appellant, the petitioner in Writ Petitions No. 28634- 635/2017, challenged the assessment order dated 4. 4.2017 by the second respondent under Section 6-A(3) of the K arnataka Entertainment Tax Act, 1958 (Hereinafter referred to as the 'KET Act', for brevity) and the consequential Demand Notice dated 4.4.2017 fo....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....und of violation of principles of natural justice, the writ petitions should have been accordingly examined.   3. The learned Counsel for the appellant has now filed a Challan for having deposited the tax part of the total demand in a sum of Rs. 1,25,552/- on 12.3.2018 along with a mem o and has urged that with this deposit, the appellant has com plied with the interim order granted on 7.7....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....he conditions necessary for entertaining the appeal. 5. The appellant has now, though belatedly, deposited the entire tax part of the total demand in a sum of Rs. 1,25,552/-, and the challenge to the subject assessment order and the consequential Demand Notice being on the ground of violation of principles of natural justice and not having been examined against that touchstone in writ petition,....