Loading...

⚠ โœ•
❮ Top
☎ Help
Draft upto 3 replies to a
tax notice โ€” FREE ๐ŸŽ‰ โœ•

150 credits ยท 30 days

โ€ข Basic Search โ†’ 1 Credit
โ€ข Advanced Search โ†’ 3 Credits
โ€ข Drafter โ†’ 20 to extract + 25 per issue
(โ‰ˆ upto 2-3 drafts on us)

Already used our earlier 20-Credit Demo?
You are still eligible for this new 150-Credit Demo.

Activate your FREE Demo โ†’
☰
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
Call Us / Help / Feedbackโœ•

Contact Us At :

✉ E-mail: [email protected]

✆ Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters 0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / TMI Blogs / RSS

2018 (3) TMI 1046

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....erintendent (A.R.), for Respondent Per: Ramesh Nair: These appeals are directed against Order-in-Appeal No. SDK/185/M-III/2013-14 dated 27.09.2013 and SDK/184/M-III/2013-14 dated 27.09.2013 only for waiver of interest and penalty. The fact of the case is that on the scrutiny of the monthly returns it was found that the appellant had paid differential duty amounting to Rs. 6,40,779/- during t....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....resident of the applicant Company submits that the differential duty was paid by the appellant on the goods sent to their own depot. It is obvious that in the case clearance of goods to depot the exact sale price is not known at the time of clearance, therefore in payment of differential duty there was no malafide intention, accordingly the impugned order is not sustainable. 3. Shri Sanjay Hasi....