2018 (3) TMI 998
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....SOCIATES, For the Appellant Mr. N. Jagadish, AR, For the Respondent Per : JUSTICE (DR.) SATISH CHANDRA All the three appeals have been filed against the Order-in-Appeal No. 88/2009-CE dated 17/08/2009; Order-in-Appeal No. 118/2009-CE dated 15/09/2009 and Order-in-Appeal No. 12/07 dated 24/08/2007. 2. Heard Shri M. S. Nagaraja, learned advocate for the appellant and Shri N. Jagadish, le....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....ithin the ambit of business auxiliary services. In view of this, he states that prima facie the appellants have a strong case on merits and made a prayer to the Bench to remand the matter to the Commissioner (Appeals) for examining the issue without insisting on pre-deposit. He also pleaded financial hardship. 3. On a careful consideration of the issue, taking into account the facts and c....
TaxTMI