2002 (8) TMI 94
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....oral submissions of learned counsel for the respective parties this court is of the view that instead of keeping the writ application pending on the file of this court it can be disposed of at this stage with certain appropriate directions. The petitioner has questioned the order dated July 26, 2002, passed by the Commissioner of Income-tax, Asansol, in exercise of the powers conferred upon him....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....ned to accept the said submission as each of the assessees has an independent cause of action in the matter. Accordingly, the writ application is confined to the petitioner whose particulars are to be found at serial No. 3 of the impugned order. The impugned order was preceded by a show-cause notice dated May 30, 2002, and consequent thereupon the petitioner preferred his objection and in my vi....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....in a period of six weeks from the date of communication of a copy of this order. It is hereby clarified that the representation already made by the petitioner which is at page 55 of the writ application, shall be deemed to be the representation of the petitioner against the notice dated May 30, 2002. Liberty is also granted to the petitioner, if so advised, to make further representation wit....
TaxTMI