2018 (3) TMI 912
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....d MR. Anil G. Shakkarwar, Member (Technical) Shri Pawan Kumar Singh (Supdt) AR, for Appellant Shri Nishant Mishra (Advocate), for Respondent Per: Anil G. Shakkarwar The present appeal is arising out of Order-in-Appeal No. 201-CE/APPL/KNP/2011 dated 30.08.2011 passed by Commissioner (Appeals), Customs and Central Excise, Kanpur. The appeal is filed by Revenue. 2. Brief facts of the c....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....t. On contest the issue was decided through Order-in-Original dated 08.06.2011, wherein the demand was confirmed and equal penalty was imposed. Aggrieved by the said order responder preferred appeal before Commissioner (Appeals). Learned Commissioner (Appeals) decided the appeal through impugned Order-in-Appeal. The learned Commissioner (Appeals) has taken into consideration the communication rece....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....ent who has submitted that the chemical examiner did not give the chemical composition of the samples forwarded to him but he has referred to Chapter Note 3 and gave his opinion that the goods were manufactured tobacco. 5. Having considered the rival contentions and on perusal of records we find that in the present case Revenue wants to delegate the power of adjudication to the chemical examine....
TaxTMI