Just a moment...

⚠✕
❮ Top
☎ Help
🚀 New Feature Launched ✕

Introducing the “In Favour Of” filter in Case Laws.

  • ⚖️ Instantly identify judgments decided in favour of the Assessee, Revenue, or Appellant
  • 🔍 Narrow down results with higher precision

Try it now in Case Laws →

☰
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback✕

Contact Us At :

✉ E-mail: [email protected]

✆ Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS
PrevPreviousNextNext

2018 (3) TMI 829

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....e<br>MR. Ashok Jindal, Member (Judicial) AND MR. Anil G. Shakkarwar, Member (Technical) Shri Rajeev Ranjan (Joint. Commr.) AR And Shri Pawan Kumar Singh (Supdt.) AR, for Appellant(s) Ms. Stuti Saggi (Proxy Counsel), for Respondent(s) Per: Ashok Jindal The present appeals are filed by Revenue. The respondents were manufacturers of Copper Sheets and Circles and Brass Sheets and Circles falling u....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....trimmed sheets of Brass, one was trimmed sheets and other was scrap and waste and that scrap was falling under Heading 7404.10 and was attracting Nil rate of duty and, therefore, untrimmed sheets and circles of Brass used as inputs for manufacture of the said two final products. Therefore, the respondents are liable to pay duty. 4. Heard the parties and peruse the records. It is very clear from t....

PrevPreviousNextNext