Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

2018 (3) TMI 381

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....icer, Ward - 38 (2), New Delhi [ the LD AO ] dated 29/03/2014 under section 143 (3) Of The Income Tax Act 1961 [the Act ] was dismissed. 2. The assessee has raised following grounds of appeal i. The Ld. AO has grossly erred in passing assessment order by making incorrect and unwarranted allegations against the assessee and without giving reasonable and fair opportunity to the assessee to present its case. ii. Under the facts and circumstances of the case, the Ld. 1st appellate authority has grossly erred in confirming the action of the Ld. AO rejecting the books of accounts of the assessee under section 145 of the act, which is grossly injudicious, against the facts of the case and bad in law. iii. Under the fa....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....s. 19.78 Lacs out of gross contract receipt of Rs. 9.71 crores for which no documentary evidences produced or furnished by the assessee. He further held that assessee has not produced any stock register as evidence of receipt of the quantity and quality of the raw material. It was further noted by him that the closing stock has also been accepted based on the self declaration of the proprietor, therefore opening and closing balance of stock is not verifiable. Therefore, the Ld. assessing officer rejected the books of accounts applying the provisions of section 145 of The Income Tax Act and rejected the book results of the assessee. He consequently estimated the net profit at the rate of 8% of the gross receipt of Rs. 9.71 crores and determi....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ntative was that despite presentation of the books of accounts before the Ld. assessing officer he rejected them without verification. With respect to the rejection of the books book results, ld AR submitted that for the past assessment years the net profit ratio of the assessee is in the range of 2.04% to 2.66%. He submitted that assessment of the appellant for the past year has been concluded under section 143 (3) of the act. He submitted that books of accounts were duly accepted by the Ld. assessing officer and the net profit ratio of 2.23% were accepted. He further submitted that merely because the books of accounts were not produced that cannot result into the rejection of the books of accounts. With respect to the estimation of the gr....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ed the books of accounts. In view of this the Ld. assessing officer has correctly rejected the books of accounts applying the provisions of section 145 (3) of The Income Tax Act. With respect to the estimation of the net profit at the rate of 8%, she submitted that when the books of accounts were not produced by the assessee in this year before the assessing officer for verification of the book results, assessee could not take shelter under the pretext of the earlier year's or subsequent assessment year's assessment orders. In those assessment years, books of accounts have been produced. In view of this it was her submission that net profit rate of 2.04% and 2.66% claimed by the assessee cannot be accepted and ld AO has correctly estimated ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....t is apparent that assessee has neither produced the books of accounts before the Ld. assessing officer and even that opportunity was not availed before the first appellate authority. Assessee has merely made certain submissions despite specific request by the Ld. assessing officer to produce the books of accounts on several occasions. Even before us, the assessee has not come out with the clean hands by producing the books of accounts. Therefore, it is clear from the records that assessee did not wish to produce the books of accounts. According to us, if the books of accounts are not produced, there is no option left with Ao other than to estimate the net profit of the business of the assessee. Therefore no fault can be found with the Ld. ....