2018 (3) TMI 240

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....nt ORDER Per: Mrs. Archana Wadhwa The challenge in the present appeals is to imposition of Rs. 2,55,782/- imposed upon the appellant in terms of the provisions of Section 11 AC of the Act. 2. After hearing the learned representative of the appellant as also the learned AR for the Revenue and after going through the impugned orders I find that the appellant is engaged in manufacture of ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....of Galaxy Textile Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise, Vapi : 2011 (263) E.L.T. 604 (Tri. Ahmedabad) observed that though the appellant had admitted shortages and have agreed to pay the duty thereon so as to avoid litigation but in the absence of any evidence to corroborate the allegations of clandestine removal, penalty is not imposable. Further, I note, no investigation has been made by the Reven....