2018 (3) TMI 3

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... Mr.M.Murugan, Government Advocate. For The Respondent : Mr.K.Vadivelu, for Mr.M.Md.Ibrahim Ali. JUDGMENT [Judgment of the Court was delivered by M. SATHYANARAYANAN, J.] The Revenue is the appellant and challenging the quashment of the notice, dated 301.08.2005, issued by the appellant/sole respondent in the writ petition, the present writ appeal is filed. 2. A perusal of the impugn....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....aining to the years 1998-1999 and 1999-2000 in Form B 3, as per Section 18(6) of the Tamil Nadu General Sales Tax Act [TNGST], has not been served on the petitioner in respect of Sree Krishna Carbide Industry and however, the appellant/respondent has issued the auction notice, dated 24.12.2002, bringing the movable property of the petitioner, for auction, on 17.04.2003. A submission was made on be....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....004, made in W.P(MD)No.787 of 2004 [S.Manikandamariappan v. The Deputy Commercial Tax Officer, Ettayapuram, Tuticorin District], found that the writ petitioner was permitted to pay a sum of Rs. 53,860/- within a period of one week from the date of order, on 27.08.2004 and the balance of Rs. 3,50,000/- to be remitted by him in six equal instalments and admittedly, he has paid the same, in complianc....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....x Officer and others] as well as 1994(93) Sales Tax Cases, 339 [Apollo Tubes Limited v. Additional Deputy Commercial Tax Officer, Ranipet and another] and also the decision rendered by the Hon'ble Supreme Court of India reported in 1995(97) Sales Tax Cases 44 [Godrej & Boyce Manufacturing Co. Ltd. v. Joint Commissioner of Commercial Taxes-IV and others] and found that in the light of the fact ....