Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

2018 (2) TMI 1491

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....l. Comm. (AR) - for Respondent Per: Raju 1. This appeal has been filed by M/s.Indian Oil Corporation Ltd. The appellant had filed a claim of refund in respect of supply of Low Sulphur High Flash High Speed (LSHFHS) Diesel to Indian Navy. They claimed exemption under Notification No.64/95-CE dated 16/03/1995. 2. Ld. Counsel for the appellant argued that they had purchased LSHFHS from M/s.B....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....er the duty amount paid by BPCL has been paid/passed on by the appellant. The matter was agitated before the Commissioner (Appeals). The Commissioner (Appeals) rejected their appeal on the ground that it is not clear that who was borne the incidence of duty of the said amount. 3. Ld. Counsel argued that they have not recovered any duty amount from the Indian Navy as is apparent from the invoice....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... "Letter dated 26/09/2006 addressed by Assistant Commissioner, Chembur-I Div. to BPCL stating that Appellant's should have claimed refund of Rs. 1,42,59,155/- ii) Certificate from BPCL stating that the duty amount of Rs. 1,2,13,104/- was paid by appellants to BPCL in respect of invoices dated 21/09/2005, 27/09/2005 and 18/10/2005. iii) BPCL's letter dated 14/03/2007 addressed to Asst. Com....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....Apex Court in the case of Leader Engineering Works (supra). The said ground of rejection has been set aside by the Commissioner (Appeals) and the said order of the Commissioner (Appeals) has not been challenged by the Revenue. The Commissioner (Appeals) had allowed consequential relief and in the said proceedings of granting consequential relief, lower authority have raised the issue regarding who....