2018 (2) TMI 911

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....                                      Shri. G.M. Sharma, AR- for the respondent ORDER Per: Ashok Jindal The appellant is in appeal against the impugned order wherein differential duty has been demanded a....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....aid coils. On receipt of the said coils, M/s ISGEC took the Cenvat Credit and cleared the same on payment of duty on the transaction value. Through an investigation, it was alleged that M/s ISGEC is selling the goods as such as the appellants have manufactured the goods in complete form, therefore, in terms of Rule 10A(ii) of Central Excise Valuation Rules, 2000, the appellants are required to pay....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....facts have not been disputed that the appellants are job worker and after manufacturing the goods and clearing on payment of duty to M/s ISGEC and M/s ISGEC is taking the credit of duty paid by the appellant and further cleared the goods on payment of duty at transaction value. The case of the Revenue is that in terms of Rule 10A(ii) of the Central Excise Valuation Rules, 2000, the appellants are ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ment and agreement between the parties M/s ISGEC has undertaken of testing at their end after goods were supplied by the appellant to M/s ISGEC. In that circumstances, activity of testing done by the M/s ISGEC amounts to manufacture as Note 6 to Section 16 of the 1st schedule of Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985. On the basis of said understanding, the appellants have cleared the goods to M/s ISGEC ....