2018 (2) TMI 794

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....: For Respondent Per: Ramesh Nair The issue involved is whether the appellant is entitled for CENVAT credit in respect of input services provided at job worker premises. 2. Ms. Aparna Hirandagi, learned Counsel appearing on behalf of the appellants submits that the job worker is carrying out the activity of manufacturing of intermediate goods which is in or in related to the manufacturing....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....i-III Vs. Interface Microsystems - 2016-TIOL-2457-CESTAT-CHD She further submits that the demand is made for beyond the normal period i.e. April 2005 to March 2007 for which show-cause notice was issued on 10.02.2009. The appellant have bonafidely availed the CENVAT credit. All the records and account whether statutory or otherwise were maintained by the appellant. The availment of credit was r....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....Collector of Central Excise, Bombay - 1995 (78) ELT 401 (S.C.) (ix) Cosmic Dye Chemical Vs. Collector of Central Excise, Bombay - 1995 (75) ELT 721 (S.C.) (x) Tamilnadu Housing Board Vs. Collector of Central Excise, Madras - 1994 (74) ELT 9 (S.C.) (xi) Chemphar Drugs & Liniments - 1989 (40) ELT 276 (SC) 3. Shri Sanjay Hasija, learned Superintendent (AR) appearing on behalf of the Reven....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ob worker it cannot be said that the service was not received by the appellant. The job worker carried out the job work i.e. manufacture of intermediate goods only for the appellant, in such case the service received even though at job work place, it is in or in relation to the manufacture of final product of the appellant, therefore such service clearly gets covered under the definition of inputs....