Loading...

⚠ โœ•
❮ Top
☎ Help
Draft upto 3 replies to a
tax notice โ€” FREE ๐ŸŽ‰ โœ•

150 credits ยท 30 days

โ€ข Basic Search โ†’ 1 Credit
โ€ข Advanced Search โ†’ 3 Credits
โ€ข Drafter โ†’ 20 to extract + 25 per issue
(โ‰ˆ upto 2-3 drafts on us)

Already used our earlier 20-Credit Demo?
You are still eligible for this new 150-Credit Demo.

Activate your FREE Demo โ†’
☰
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
Call Us / Help / Feedbackโœ•

Contact Us At :

✉ E-mail: [email protected]

✆ Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters 0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / TMI Blogs / RSS

2018 (2) TMI 722

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... Shri Sandeep Kumar Singh, Deputy Commissioner (AR), for Respondent Per: Archana Wadhwa After hearing both sides, we find that the appellant, who is a SEZ Unit, filed Refund Claim in terms of Notification No. 9/2009-S.T. dated 3rd March, 2009 which stand rejected on the ground of time bar. 2. Learned Counsel for the appellant submits that the Notification itself provides for extension ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....) S.T.R. 576 (Tri. - Ahmedabad); (4) Makers Mart Versus Commissioner of Central Excise & Service Tax, Jaipur-II reported at 2016 (44) S.T.R. 126 (Tri. - Delhi); (5) Cumins Technologies India Pvt. Ltd. Versus Commissioner of Central Excise & Service Tax, Bhopal reported at 2017 (49) S.T.R. 319 (Tri. - Delhi) & (6) Intas Pharma Ltd. Versus Commissioner of Service Tax, Ahmedabad reported at ....