2018 (2) TMI 685

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... Counsel, for Assessee Shri Gyanendta Kr Tripathi, Assistant Commissioner (AR), for Revenue Per: Anil G. Shakkarwar The above stated two appeals are arising out of a common impugned Order-in-Original No. 11/ST/Commissioner/2011 dated 29/04/2011 passed by Commissioner of Central Excise & Service Tax, Kanpur, therefore, they are taken together for decision. 2. The brief facts of the case....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....10.2009, demanding Service Tax of Rs. 85,67,676/- under proviso to Sub-section (1) of Section 73 of Finance Act, 1994. Further, there was a proposal to appropriate Rs. 11,18,223/- paid by the appellant-assessee. In addition there were other proposals in the said show cause notice. The appellant-assessee submitted before the Original authority that the issue was already decided by the decision of H....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....nce Act, 1994. The said order also appropriate an amount of Rs. 11,18,223/-. Further, penalties were imposed. Aggrieved by the said order, appellant M/s Allied Exims preferred present appeal which is bearing Appeal No.ST/1244/2011. Further, aggrieved by the said order for not confirming the demand up to 18.04.2006, Revenue has preferred appeal which is bearing Appeal No.ST/1278/2011. 3. M/s All....