2018 (2) TMI 451

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... Sri M. Kumar, AGA) Respondent: (By Sri Pramod S. Yadwad And Sri H.R. Kambiyavar, Advocates) S. Sujatha J. COMMON ORDER These revision petitions are directed against the common judgment passed by the Karnataka Appellate Tribunal at Bengaluru ('the Tribunal' for short) in S.T.A. Nos. 914 to 934/2012 Cross Appeal Nos. S.T.A.Nos.136 5 to 1385/2014 and S.T.A. Nos. 892 to 903/2013 for the a....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....als before the Tribunal. The Tribunal was pleased to allow the appeals and held that iron and steel used in the works contract is liable to tax at 4% as declared goods. 4. Being aggrieved by the common judgment of the Tribunal, the Revenue has preferred these revision petitions. 5. We have heard Sri M. Kumar, learned Addl. Government Advocate appearing for the petitioner- Revenue as well as ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....cross the shelf in the open market? 7. The Tribunal while considering the matter as to whether the tax is leviable at 4% as declared goo ds on iron and steel used in the execution of works contr act has recorded the reasons in confirming the rate of tax at 4% on the sale of items of iron and steel utilized in the execution of the works contract. The issue involved herein is no longer res integr....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....aints mentioned in Section 15 of the Central Sales Tax Act. A sales tax revision petition filed before the High Court yielded an order dated 14.06.2007 by which the assessee was sent back to the Appellate Tribunal for rectification. This rectification petition was dismissed by an order dated 30.11.2005. A sales tax revision petition was thereafter filed against both orders, namely, 11.01.200....