2018 (2) TMI 422

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....oli Sema, Advocate for D-1. Ms.Anjali J.Manish with Ms.Nidhi Saini, Advocates for D-2 JUDGMENT Manmohan, J: ( Oral ) 1. Present suit has been filed for permanent injunction restraining infringement of trade mark, copyright, passing off, rendition of accounts, directions etc. 2. Learned predecessor of this Court vide order dated 19th September, 2013 had restrained the defendants from se....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....2 is not interested in taking delivery of the LOTUS goods and has no objection if the same are confiscated and/or destroyed by the custom authorities in accordance with law. 5. She emphasis that defendant no.2 has not imported any goods bearing the mark LOTUS and she undertakes that even in future no goods bearing the said mark shall be imported without taking specific permission/authorization ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....aintiff states that he is confining his relief to prayer 30(ii) and 30(iii) of the plaint against defendant no.3. 11. A Coordinate Bench of this Court Satya Infrastructure Ltd. & Ors. Vs. Satya Infra & Estates Pvt. Ltd., 2013 SCC OnLine Del 508, has held as under:- "4. The next question which arises is whether this Court should consider the application for interim relief and direct the....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....laint or to any exhibit marks being put on the documents which have been filed by the plaintiffs and are already on record. I have therefore heard the counsel for the plaintiffs on merits qua the relief of injunction." 12. Keeping in view the aforesaid mandate of law and the fact that the defendant no. 3 has no real prospect of defending the claim as it has neither entered appearance nor filed ....