2017 (3) TMI 1620
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
.... None, for the Respondent. ORDER This appeal is directed against the Order-in-Appeal No. 14/DIB/CE(A)/GHY/2013, dated 16-5-2013. 2. When the case was called, none appears on behalf of the respondents despite notice. No adjournment request has been read. Also, none appeared on 31-1-2017. Since the issue lies in a narrow compass, the case is taken up for hearing in the absence of th....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....rest amounting to Rs. 18,84,709/- and Rs. 12,80,248/- and also imposed personal penalty of Rs. 5000/- under Rule 8(4) read with Rule 27 of Central Excise Rule, 2002, in each order. 5. The First Appellate Authority allowed the appeal filed by the appellant-assessee. Being aggrieved, the appellant-Revenue is in appeal before the Tribunal. 6. The ld. AR appearing on behalf of the reve....
Generate professional replies, appeals, opinions to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
TaxTMI