2017 (3) TMI 1620
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
.... None, for the Respondent. ORDER This appeal is directed against the Order-in-Appeal No. 14/DIB/CE(A)/GHY/2013, dated 16-5-2013. 2. When the case was called, none appears on behalf of the respondents despite notice. No adjournment request has been read. Also, none appeared on 31-1-2017. Since the issue lies in a narrow compass, the case is taken up for hearing in the absence of th....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....rest amounting to Rs. 18,84,709/- and Rs. 12,80,248/- and also imposed personal penalty of Rs. 5000/- under Rule 8(4) read with Rule 27 of Central Excise Rule, 2002, in each order. 5. The First Appellate Authority allowed the appeal filed by the appellant-assessee. Being aggrieved, the appellant-Revenue is in appeal before the Tribunal. 6. The ld. AR appearing on behalf of the reve....
TaxTMI