Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / TMI Blogs / RSS

2018 (1) TMI 1254

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... Couplers and other items on job work basis to M/s. Aban Constructions (Pvt.) Ltd. It appeared to the department that appellants were required discharge their duty liability in respect of job-worked goods, since as per the terms of conversion order, the charges paid were inclusive of all relevant taxes, duties, packing, forwarding, freight and insurance. A show-cause notice dated 21.02.2007 was issued to the appellants inter alia proposing recovery of duty liability of Rs. 6,57,639/- with interest liability thereon and imposition of penalties under various provisions of law. 2. After due process of adjudication, the original authority vide order dated 29.10.2007 confirmed the demand of the said duty liability and also imposed penalty of ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... materials has to give an undertaking to the Assistant/Deputy Commissioner of Central Excise having jurisdiction over the factory of the job worker that (a) the said goods shall be used in or in relation to the manufacture of the final products in his factory; and (b) that the goods removed would be without payment of duty from his job worker's factory. 5. Heard both sides and have gone through the records. 6. Perusal of the show-cause notice dated 21.02.2007, will indicate that the main grounds for proposing the demand of duty from the appellants was that the raw materials were not supplied under job work challans, either under Notification No.214/86 or under Rule 4(5) of Cenvat Credit Rules, 2002. There is also an allegation tha....