2015 (7) TMI 1263
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....isposal. 2.This writ petition has been filed by Olam Agro India Private Limited represented by Pradeep challenging the impugned Goods Detention Notice no.1058 dated 10.07.2015 (Form No.041), to quash the same and for further direction to release the goods. 3.Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner in support of the prayer contended that the petitioner is a company having their registered of....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
.... stated that the goods are not for sale but for processing only. 5.Therefore, the grievance of the petitioner is when the consignor is their branch at Kanyakumari District in Tamil Nadu, the consignee is their own branch at Visakhapatnam, Olam Agro India Private Limited is one and the same under the Act and there is no question of sale involved. While this is the position, with regard to the move....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....een the same company. It was also brought to the notice of the respondent that the goods have been moved with Form JJ along with e-way bill of Olam, Visakhapatnam. However, the respondent has passed the impugned order. 7.Challenging the same, among other grounds it was also requested by the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner that since the goods are likely to get damaged, the goods may ....