2018 (1) TMI 767

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....For Respondent : Mr.S.Rajasekar Senior Panel Counsel ORDER Heard Mr.R.L.Ramani, learned Senior Counsel for Mr.B.Raveendran, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and Mr.S.Rajasekar, learned Senior Standing Counsel accepts notice on behalf of the respondent. With the consent on either side, the writ  petition is taken up for final disposal. 2. The petitioner in this writ p....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....etitioner resisted the proposal in the show cause notice by filing their objections on 06.09.2013. The objections were found to be not acceptable and the Commissioner rejected the same and passed Order-in-Original dated 10.01.2014, which order is impugned in this writ petition. 4. Mr.S.Rajasekar, learned Senior Standing Counsel for the Revenue stoutly opposed the prayer sought for in the writ p....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....tallments of Rs. 75 lakhs each. In the meantime, since the petitioner did not comply with the condition, the appeal stood dismissed. This was challenged by the petitioner, by filing W.P.No.32963 of 2007. Against the miscellaneous order i.e., the order in the application for waiver of pre-deposit, the petitioner preferred Civil Miscellaneous Appeal No.2214 of 2015. Both these matter were heard toge....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....proceedings under the Income Tax Act and the Tamil Nadu Value Added Tax Act and the matters are pending at various stages. Apart from that though the Order-in-Original was passed in the year 2014, the Central Excise Department has not been able to recover a portion of the amount pending disposal of the appeal and the Department have been drawn into the litigation ever since 2014 onwards. Therefore....