2010 (8) TMI 1096

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....vocate with Ms. Soumya Srikrishnai/by M/s.Wadia Ghandy & Co. For theState-respondent No.1.: Mr. Milind More, Assistant Government Pleader For the SRA: Mr. J.G. Reddy SPEAKING TO MINUTES We recall our order dated 30th July, 2010 for passing a fresh order substantially in the same terms but after noticing the inadvertant errors which had crept in the said order dated 30th July, 2010. The correct....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....tment of the Union of India is not a party to this proceeding, respondent No.5 may not be held liable if the Mahanagar Telephone Nigam Limited is given the above built up area free of costs. 3. Since the Slum Development Authority itself has indicated in the scheme itself, that the built up area admeasuring 1706 sq. metres is to be handed over to MTNL, no prejudice would be caused if respondent ....